Subscribers iconSite access

home subscribe

Community Investors' blog

Print
Email
Text size
Comment

A brave new world

20 May 2008 [0 comments]

More than any previous economic cycle, the current slowing of US economic growth highlights the dawn of the Asian century. Most developed countries are transformed by economic and demographic shifts, which will themselves comprise major economic themes, but Asia itself will have the greatest impact on the development of the economic global village.

The old world economy has lost its US anchor and is now supported by emerging markets. There are significant global strains in the food and water industries, which highlight long-term investment attractions in food, agriculture and water.

Economic decoupling
The global economy has now decoupled from its historic US economic leadership. But the global economic boom is not dead – its engines have simply changed. If analysts and investors are prepared to embrace the new world order, 2008 could be a year of great opportunities.

The Asia Pacific region now accounts for almost 37 per cent of world GDP on a purchasing power parity basis, and China alone contributed 17 per cent of global growth in 2007. That is significantly more than the US economy. Emerging Asia contributed 40 per cent to global growth last year, and developing countries 52 per cent.

At the same time, commodity prices continue to rise, driven largely by food and energy
price inflation. Eighteen of 22 emerging markets now face inflation rates exceeding their stated targets. This will continue for three reasons.

First, more countries are reverting to politically motivated price-fixing mechanisms. This will not curb consumer demand or provide incentives for investment in production, exacerbating scarcity.

Second, with infrastructure growth accelerating, developing countries are seeking to
secure resources before their competitors.

Finally, agricultural production requires more and more power as countries seek
to satisfy a 50 per cent increase in the demand for food. Combined with water scarcity and desertification, prices will rise for agricultural goods and energy.

Imbalances in agriculture
Global agricultural production has peaked, while food demand is not going down any time soon. Rising food prices are causing riots anywhere from Cairo to Mexico.

In South Asia, approximately half of the land has been degraded so it no longer has the capacity for food production. China has seen an irreversible loss of nearly a third of its arable land. Over half the world’s population is currently facing a food crisis and a negative water balance, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

We are witnessing just the beginning of a massive pent-up demand for protein from emerging economies. Producing one kilogram of meat requires about 15 times more water than one kilogram of grain. As a consequence, once-mighty rivers now carry a fraction of their former volume and groundwater tables are falling.

Productivity can be raised through genetic engineering, sustainable irrigation, fertilisation and farming technology. The question is whether new technologies can boost the supplies fast enough to meet demands. I am confident that both commodity and equity investors in water, food and agriculture will continue to do very well in relative and absolute terms.

There are currently no comments on this post.

 

Advertisement

Related Content

Interesting links
 

Leave a comment

Comment


Q&A More investors' blog

Market Insider: Sunset Boulevard

8 August 2008 [0 comments]

Michael Wilson suggests that Japan is in poor condition to face the current global economic crisis

Something for everyone

4 August 2008 [0 comments]

Keiron Root considers the range of services provided by private client stockbrokers and investment managers

Getting the basics right

31 July 2008 [0 comments]

What Investment catches up with The Share Centre to find out how investment clubs can benefit from the services provided by their advisers

 
 

Recommendations Recommendations

 

Q&A Q&A forum

The limitations of nominees 8 August 2008 [0 comments]

 

Having read various pieces in your magazine at different times regarding the merits and demerits of certificated and nominee share dealing, it seems to me that certain advantages of holding certificates have been missed.
Indeed, I recently attended an Alliance Trust Roadshow and sat on a ‘shareholder club’ discussion group, where I was amazed to find, among a fairly sophisticated bunch of investors, such a lack of appreciation as to the shareholder rights one loses with a nominee account.
As an extra thread, I also recently attended the AGM of an investment trust in Edinburgh. As a trustee to my grandchildren’s funds, my name was missing from the list at reception. I was told that I was welcome to the meeting as long as I didn’t participate in the voting.
I was further informed that had I informed the plan managers of the trusts beforehand, I could have voted. It occurred to me that nominee shareholders may well find that if they feel strongly about an issue, they might be able to exercise their voting rights in a similar way. I would be interested in your panel’s thoughts on this subject.
Bev Wilkinson
via email

more

 

Q&A Events