Subscribers iconSite access
Newsletter signup

home subscribe

Community Q&A forum

Print
Email
Text size
Comment

Concentrating on returns

Answered by Jonathan Davis
1 October 2007 [0 comments]

Q: 

A panel of independent experts answers readers’ financial planning and investment queries

A: 

I have three grandchildren, aged 12, eight and six. When each grandchild was born, I took out an insurance-based investment plan that buys units in various sectors. The premium was £50 per month for 25 years.

I recently saw a list of ten or more insurance companies showing the anticipated return on policies with a premium of £50 per month for 25 years. The company with which my grandchildren’s policies are invested was in the bottom three, and it has regularly been in that position.

I was originally attracted to these policies because of their built-in flexibility. In effect, there were five £10 policies and each one could be cashed in without affecting the other four. Now I no longer consider that flexibility as being as important as the return, since it would be possible to cover flexibility in other ways.

Is it sensible to make the policies paid up and transfer to another company? And would it be possible to use the money raised in this way to buy additional years?

Mr F Cocks, Bristol

Jonathan Davis replies:

It appears that you purchased endowment plans without extra life assurance (the type that used to be the norm for covering a mortgage and saving to pay it back eventually). Endowments are not usually efficient for saving long term. Often the charges are high and the fund choices highly restricted. And you cannot buy additional years like occupational pensions.

There are essentially two types of funds that you could have opted for – with profits or funds based on other investments, such as equities or commercial property. If you opted for the former, then these funds (on average 40 per cent equities, 40 per cent Government and corporate bonds, 15 per cent property and the remainder in cash) may not perform particularly well over the next 13 to 19 years.

These asset classes will be hit increasingly by rising global interest rates. Thus – solely on the information you have provided – I would stop saving into them and redirect your funds to more efficient arrangements and asset classes (i.e. investment funds) with a greater opportunity for growth.

There are currently no comments on this post.

 
Other questions answered by Jonathan Davis

Advertisement

Q&A  More Q&A forumspacerQ&AAsk a question

Sector confusion

27 September 2008 [0 comments]

Q: 

Could you please advise me where you are now placing Jupiter Emerging European Opportunities in the monthly tables of Unit Trust Performance.
It seems to have disappeared!

Christopher Chalker,
Via e-mail

 
 

Recommendations Recommendations

 
moreSafer than houses
26 November 2008
unlock
unlock
moreM&G Global Dividend Fund
24 November 2008
unlock
more22% Rental Yield Per Annum
20 November 2008
unlock
 
 

Q&A Investors' blog

European sector review: Don’t go too near the water

20 November 2008 [0 comments]

Henk Potts cautions investors considering what is usually a defensive sector

After the bulls have run

18 November 2008 [0 comments]

Michael Wilson explains why investors contemplating putting their money into Spanish assets would be well advised to wait

Market adjustments

12 November 2008 [0 comments]

Robert Tyerman assesses how global markets will adjust to a new set of financial rules

 
 

Q&A Events

 
moreQuoted Company Awards
28th January London
moreM&A Awards 2009
18th February London