Subscribers iconSite access

home subscribe

Community Q&A forum

Print
Email
Text size
Comment

The limitations of nominees

Answered by Angus Rigby
8 August 2008 [0 comments]

Q: 

Having read various pieces in your magazine at different times regarding the merits and demerits of certificated and nominee share dealing, it seems to me that certain advantages of holding certificates have been missed.
Indeed, I recently attended an Alliance Trust Roadshow and sat on a ‘shareholder club’ discussion group, where I was amazed to find, among a fairly sophisticated bunch of investors, such a lack of appreciation as to the shareholder rights one loses with a nominee account.
As an extra thread, I also recently attended the AGM of an investment trust in Edinburgh. As a trustee to my grandchildren’s funds, my name was missing from the list at reception. I was told that I was welcome to the meeting as long as I didn’t participate in the voting.
I was further informed that had I informed the plan managers of the trusts beforehand, I could have voted. It occurred to me that nominee shareholders may well find that if they feel strongly about an issue, they might be able to exercise their voting rights in a similar way. I would be interested in your panel’s thoughts on this subject.
Bev Wilkinson
via email

A: 

Angus Rigby replies:
Nominee accounts can be a very convenient and secure way to hold shares electronically. But until recently, investors who held shares in nominee accounts could not enjoy many of the perks and rights enjoyed by investors who have direct shareholdings in companies.   

However, new legislation came into force in November 2007 that resulted in better access to investors who hold shares in nominee accounts. The Companies Act included a number of provisions to the benefit of nominee shareholders.

Shareholders using any broker’s nominee service now have the right to not only attend but also speak and vote at company meetings, and even enjoy the same discounts and perks that are available to direct investors.

Listed companies are also happy to send out annual reports and other information to existing and prospective investors. All you need to do is call the company’s head office.  Alternatively, you can often download reports and presentations from the company’s website.

While on the subject of nominee holdings, it is worth mentioning how your assets are protected in a nominee account. UK stockbrokers have to hold your shares in accordance with the FSA’s Client Asset Rules. Under these rules, customers’ shareholdings are held by separate legal entities who act as custodians of the shares and agree to ensure that the firm cannot utilise the assets. This means that, in the unlikely event of your broker going into liquidation, the firm’s outstanding creditors are not allowed access to client shareholdings to settle debts.

Therefore, it is difficult to envisage a situation whereby a customer would need to apply to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to get compensation for a ‘lost’ shareholding (the FSCS guarantees 100 per cent of the first £30,000 of shareholdings and 90 per cent of the next £20,000) in the event of a protected claim that the firm
is not able to assist with.

There are currently no comments on this post.

 
Other questions answered by Angus Rigby

Advertisement

Q&A  More Q&A forumspacerQ&AAsk a question

Disappearing trust 

15 August 2008 [0 comments]

Q: 

I wish to draw your attention to the ‘Resources Investment Trust’, which is listed in What Investment in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Liquidity’.  In fact, this trust should be in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources.
The trust was correctly listed in ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources’ up to and including August 2007, issue 293, but in the next issue, September 2007, it had been moved to ‘Specialist: Liquidity’.
Also, the performance figures in issue 302 of What Investment, May 2008, for the Resources Investment Trust appear to be somewhat excessive – far outperforming the Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust. Are you certain that these figures are accurate? The reason I query the figures is because I have seen performance figures for these trusts in
other publications where the Resources Investment Trust mostly underperforms the
Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust.
Derek Crawford
Via email

 
 

Recommendations Recommendations

 

Q&A Investors' blog

Brighter later

26 August 2008 [0 comments]

Andy Parson, fund manager at The Share Centre, suggests that the financial arena will get much worse before it gets better, in his latest blog for www.whatinvestment.co.uk

The Money Doctor

22 August 2008 [0 comments]

Andrew Merricks considers how investing in growth stocks can ease your IHT liability

There’s no time like the present

20 August 2008 [0 comments]

Keiron Root reminds readers of one of the fundamental rules of successful investing 

 
 

Q&A Events

 
moreM&A Awards 2009
21st February London