Where there’s a will
Q:
My husband and I made our wills in February 2007, with a will-writing company. We asked for their advice regarding inheritance tax and they advised us to include a will trust and to change joint ownership to tenants in common.
We have no children and our trustees are my niece and nephew.
With the inheritance tax threshold being increased to £600,000, would it be in our interest to have the trust taken out of our wills? And can you tell us what is best – joint ownership on the deeds or tenants in common? Does it make much difference? We would appreciate your advice.
Diane Lloyd, Birmingham
A:
Donna Bradshaw replies:
The rules for inheritance tax have changed since you made your wills last year, to your advantage.
The Chancellor announced the changes in the Pre-Budget Statement last October, with the changes becoming effective immediately. The changes allowed any unused inheritance tax nil rate band to be passed on to the surviving spouse or civil partner; meaning that the maximum nil rate band on death of the survivor would be double the nil rate band; i.e. £600,000 for the tax year 2007/08.
The change was introduced to help those couples who were caught by inheritance tax due to the rise in value of their home, which was their main asset, and took away the need to take out a will trust and alter the ownership of one’s home to make use of both nil rate bands.
If your affairs are very straightforward and your main asset is your home, there isn’t really any need to do a will trust and change ownership to tenants in common as all it will really do is give you more expense and paperwork for no benefit.
If, however, you have significant liquid assets and/or your affairs are complicated, there may be benefit in writing a will trust.
There are currently no comments on this post.
Advertisement
More Q&A forum
Ask a question
Sector confusion
27 September 2008 [0 comments]Q:
Could you please advise me where you are now placing Jupiter Emerging European Opportunities in the monthly tables of Unit Trust Performance.
It seems to have disappeared!
Christopher Chalker,
Via e-mail
- Stopping the losses 13 September 2008 [0 comments]
- Repayment dilemma 6 September 2008 [0 comments]
- Suspended animation 22 August 2008 [0 comments]
- Disappearing trust 15 August 2008 [0 comments]
- The limitations of nominees 8 August 2008 [0 comments]
Recommendations
Investors' blog
Suspended animation
27 December 2008 [0 comments]Terry Bond recognises that there are attractive opportunities out there, for those with cash to invest
The seven per cent solution
11 December 2008 [0 comments]Keiron Root reminds investors of why they should keep faith with the stock market
Forced annuitisation at 75
8 December 2008 [0 comments]Jonathon Howard, head of corporate clients at Courtiers, suggests that, since the minimum retirement age is being raised from 50 to 55 in 2010, there should be a corresponding rise in the maximum age at which an annuity can be purchased.

