Diversification matters
Q:
In last month’s magazine, you suggested ‘diversifying your portfolio’ as a way of reducing the impact on one’s wealth. If you are lucky enough to have a portfolio of, say, £50k, I would say that was also common sense. For those of us who don’t have that sort of money, what are our options to protect more modest sums? Most advisers that I’ve encountered aren’t interested because giving advice is costly to them and out of proportion to the commission they may receive.
I favour monthly savings schemes and currently have a unit trust holding in a Special Situations Fund worth about £6k. This has been replaced by another unit trust savings scheme, only this time in an Income Fund, which is worth about £1k. The fund has a good record of producing above average dividend and capital growth. Both are within ISAs.
I have recently inherited some money, about £30k and want to invest about 50 per cent of it in the stock market. How do I start to diversify and then protect the value of my investments? Should I simply spread the money evenly around top-performing funds in Europe, America and Emerging markets, or ‘drip feed’ the money into these sectors to avoid any problems with timing? Am I best sticking to unit/investment trusts, accepting the bid/offer spread or going for single priced OEICs?
Mr J Treacy, Via email
A:
It is a shame to hear that you have had trouble getting any financial advice because you save on a regular basis, but on the flip side, you obviously do your homework and I hope that you have picked well-managed investments.
As you now have a larger sum to invest, you could take advantage of this and get some independent financial advice, including a review of your current investments. Failing this, continue to read the financial press to get ideas of well-managed funds but it will be at your discretion as to whether they are suitable for you or not.
As you have pointed out, diversification is really important to try and manage risk. This means diversifying between asset classes as well as providers and geographical regions. Either you can split your money between a number of different investments to create a portfolio that matches your risk profile, or you could consider a multi-manager or multi-asset fund.
With stock markets volatile once again, it brings home the need to include a number of asset classes within your investment portfolio to reduce volatility and this is where a multi-asset fund can be so useful. Not only will it include these assets, such as UK and international equities, fixed interest and property, as well as alternative assets such as hedge funds and structured products, but it will execute active management between them.’
While equities play an important role, alternative investments and fixed interest are all important non-equity correlated assets, which can help diversify and, therefore, reduce overall volatility. And you don’t need to have loads of money to invest. Some funds allow low minimum investment amounts and even offer regular savings plans for premiums of as little as £50 per month.
Investing on a monthly basis can remove an element of the risk of poor timing, however, as any stock market-linked investment should be held for the long term anyway, it could be just as beneficial to invest a lump sum, especially when we have seen the stock markets take a tumble. Maybe invest half over the course of six or 12 months and half as a lump sum. There is no way of knowing which route will buy you the largest number of units.
Whether you choose unit trusts or OEICs makes no difference as they are so similar – what is important is the outcome, so it is better to pick a fund based on the manager’s expertise, rather than its investment structure.
There are currently no comments on this post.
Advertisement
More Q&A forum
Ask a question
Disappearing trust
15 August 2008 [0 comments]Q:
I wish to draw your attention to the ‘Resources Investment Trust’, which is listed in What Investment in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Liquidity’. In fact, this trust should be in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources.
The trust was correctly listed in ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources’ up to and including August 2007, issue 293, but in the next issue, September 2007, it had been moved to ‘Specialist: Liquidity’.
Also, the performance figures in issue 302 of What Investment, May 2008, for the Resources Investment Trust appear to be somewhat excessive – far outperforming the Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust. Are you certain that these figures are accurate? The reason I query the figures is because I have seen performance figures for these trusts in
other publications where the Resources Investment Trust mostly underperforms the
Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust.
Derek Crawford
Via email
- The limitations of nominees 8 August 2008 [0 comments]
- Further information 1 August 2008 [0 comments]
- Downsizing option 25 July 2008 [0 comments]
- Taxing questions 18 July 2008 [0 comments]
- Open or closed? 11 July 2008 [0 comments]
Recommendations
Investors' blog
There’s no time like the present
20 August 2008 [0 comments]Keiron Root reminds readers of one of the fundamental rules of successful investing
Land of confusion
19 August 2008 [0 comments]Guy Monson guides investors through the shocks currently affecting the global economy
European sector review
14 August 2008 [0 comments]Henk Potts sees value beginning to appear among the financial stocks
Events
Top 10 Life Funds, 3yr%
| SKANDIA BLACKROCK... | +119.2 | ||
| ZURICH LATIN AMER... | +108.7 | ||
| ZURICH LATIN AMER... | +108.4 | ||
| NU GARTMORE CHINA... | +88.4 | ||
| SKANDIA THREADNEE... | +86.9 | ||
| SKANDIA INVESCO P... | +86.0 | ||
| SKANDIA JPM NEW E... | +83.3 | ||
| AXA GARTMORE CHIN... | +82.8 | ||
| AXA FIRST STATE G... | +79.2 | ||
| ZURICH BGI UK EQU... | +76.9 | ||
