An inconvenient restriction
Q:
I am an 80-year-old pensioner and was recently contacted by my pension fund manager about future annual pension rises. I was asked to make a choice between a guaranteed annual increase of...
A:
I am an 80-year-old pensioner and was recently contacted by my pension fund manager about future annual pension rises. I was asked to make a choice between a guaranteed annual increase of three per cent or the rate of inflation up to a ceiling of five per cent.
I opted for the inflation rate up to five per cent. I based my decision on RPI, which has been rising, but now understand that my pension scheme rises are based on CPI which, for some reason, seems to be falling, down from 3.1 per cent to 2.5 per cent. Have I made a bad decision?
You have not made a bad decision! The fact that your pension will increase is great news and will ensure that the buying power of your pension will remain reasonably consistent over time.
Inflation figures are calculated in a number of different ways and the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) forms the basis for the Government’s inflation target. This was set at an annual rate of two per cent in December 2003 and is also an internationally comparable measure of inflation, published in the UK until December 2003 as the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP).
Although the name has changed, the CPI and HICP remain one and the same, calculated according to rules specified in a series of European regulations.
The CPI uses essentially the same basic price data as the RPI but differs from it in some important respects, for example:
- the goods and services covered by the index. For instance, the CPI does not include council tax and a number of housing costs faced by homeowners. But there are also some services covered by the CPI â“ such as charges for financial services â“ which are not in the RPI.
- the people whose expenditure is covered by the weights. The CPI covers a broader population than the RPI.
- the mathematical formulae used to calculate the price changes for the most detailed components of the two indices. In practice, this means that the CPI always shows a lower inflation rate than the RPI for given price data.
- the way in which the goods and services are classified.
The CPI follows international definitions while the RPI has its own specific structure, which results in differences.
There are currently no comments on this post.
Advertisement
More Q&A forum
Ask a question
Downsizing option
25 July 2008 [0 comments]Q:
We have lived in our very large house in a very small village for nearly 25 years, where we have built a life and are very happy. The house now has a very high value in financial terms.
However, we are now looking at the prospect of having to make a downsize move, mostly because of the financial implications of owning a house of this size, such as higher heating bills, council tax, insurance and other essential expenditure.
We have looked into the area of equity release schemes but have constantly been told that it is more cost effective to downsize to a smaller property. However, even if we did downsize to such a property, it would still be of a high value in this area.
Additionally, it would be very expensive to make this move, considering the potential costs involved in moving home. We have calculated that it will cost us close to £100,000 to move, taking into account estate agent fees, legal fees, stamp duty and various moving costs. This £100,000 is immediately wasted and, on a personal note, we would have to start a new life in our retirement.
These factors therefore bring us back to equity release. We would require an additional income of up to £20,000 per annum for possibly a ten-year period before we need to move. If the calculation was for a property valued at £1.5 million, we would only need an increase in the property value of around two per cent a year to cover the withdrawal of £20,000 for income and the interest payments. Would this be the preferable solution in investment terms for our situation, rather than taking the money out of the property by downsizing, especially in view of the current outlook for house prices, and then investing the funds elsewhere and paying more tax on the funds we have released?
G Boot, Kent
- Taxing questions 18 July 2008 [0 comments]
- Open or closed? 11 July 2008 [0 comments]
- Foreign exchange 19 April 2008 [0 comments]
- Seeking security 12 April 2008 [0 comments]
- Shared concerns 5 April 2008 [0 comments]
Recommendations
Investors' blog
The Money Doctor
25 July 2008 [0 comments]Andrew Merricks explains why regularly reviewing your investments should be an essential part of your strategy
After the boom comes the bust
23 July 2008 [0 comments]Keiron Root hopes that the commodity price boom doesn’t get out of hand
Marriage guidance
22 July 2008 [0 comments]Terry Bond dons the garb of an agony uncle, with helpful tips to help investment clubs stay together when the going gets tough
Events
Top 10 Inv Trusts, 3yr%
| F&C Private Equit... | +247.7 | ||
| BlackRock Latin A... | +232.3 | ||
| JPMorgan Russian ... | +214.4 | ||
| Ecofin Water & Po... | +186.8 | ||
| Asset Management ... | +159.2 | ||
| European Utilitie... | +156.2 | ||
| BlackRock World M... | +141.5 | ||
| Resources Investm... | +140.6 | ||
| Close Enhanced Co... | +137.7 | ||
| SVM UK Emerging Fund | +114.1 | ||
