Junior options
Q:
Please can you give advice on the benefits of a Child Trust Fund compared to an ISA for money over and above that provided by the Government.
M Brody, Via email
A:
The CTF is effectively an ISA for kids, one that will legally become available to them at 18. Obviously, kids cannot invest into their own ISA until 16, at which point they can open a cash ISA, so this is a way of investing for them while leaving your own ISA allowance available for saving for your future.
The downside is a lack of flexibility as the money can’t be accessed until they reach age 18 and then the money is theirs so they can do what they like with it, which is fine as long as you have a responsible 18 year old!
It is a particularly tax-efficient savings vehicle for parents, as investments outside the CTF (and the NS&I Children’s Bonus Bond) may be taxable depending on the amount of interest earned. This is known as the “£100 rule” simply because that’s the amount of income that can be earned tax free each year. On any money gifted by a parent into a child’s name, if the income earned on that money is greater than £100 (per parent), the whole amount is taxed as though it belongs to the parent, therefore, at their marginal tax rate!
Investing into an ISA in your name for your child is the best way to retain control of the money. If you choose the ISA route, you need to consider earmarking it in your will, so that if you should die before you give the money to your child, it is clear that it was designated for them.
In summary, there are pros and cons to investing into the CTF – you just need to decide which route offers you and your child the most benefit.
There are currently no comments on this post.
Advertisement
More Q&A forum
Ask a question
Repayment dilemma
6 September 2008 [0 comments]Q:
I own a second property, which I rent out for £300 per month. The majority of this money is currently used to pay off the mortgage repayment, insurance, rates and any repairs. I am not concerned about the fact that I do not make money on the house, as it is appreciating each year in value and the longer-term plan is to use this house to supplement my pension in retirement.
At the moment, the mortgage is £170 per month and almost £80 is made up of interest. It is a small mortgage, currently £15,000. I have this money invested in stocks and shares and was considering taking this money and paying off the mortgage.
There are obvious tax implications with this, but I was thinking that I would be better off paying the tax (if it was less than £80) rather than paying £80 per month in interest. Can you please advise if this would be a wise move or should I just leave the money invested in the stocks and shares and continue to have the tenant pay off the existing bills?
Mr J Roy,
Armagh
- Suspended animation 22 August 2008 [0 comments]
- Disappearing trust 15 August 2008 [0 comments]
- The limitations of nominees 8 August 2008 [0 comments]
- Further information 1 August 2008 [0 comments]
- Downsizing option 25 July 2008 [0 comments]
Recommendations
Investors' blog
There’s no time like the present
20 August 2008 [0 comments]Keiron Root reminds readers of one of the fundamental rules of successful investing
Land of confusion
19 August 2008 [0 comments]Guy Monson guides investors through the shocks currently affecting the global economy
European sector review
14 August 2008 [0 comments]Henk Potts sees value beginning to appear among the financial stocks
Events
Top 10 Pension Fds, 5yr%
| SKANDIA BLACKROCK... | +368.6 | ||
| SKANDIA INVESCO P... | +291.7 | ||
| SKANDIA THREADNEE... | +278.6 | ||
| CLER MED MANAGED ... | +253.3 | ||
| M&G PP EMERGING M... | +249.2 | ||
| SKANDIA PROF JPM ... | +225.8 | ||
| SKANDIA JPM EMERG... | +213.3 | ||
| SKANDIA BARING EA... | +199.6 | ||
| AIG PPB ABERDEEN ... | +180.3 | ||
| AIG TGSB ABERDEEN... | +180.3 | ||
