A brave new world
More than any previous economic cycle, the current slowing of US economic growth highlights the dawn of the Asian century. Most developed countries are transformed by economic and demographic shifts, which will themselves comprise major economic themes, but Asia itself will have the greatest impact on the development of the economic global village.
The old world economy has lost its US anchor and is now supported by emerging markets. There are significant global strains in the food and water industries, which highlight long-term investment attractions in food, agriculture and water.
Economic decoupling
The global economy has now decoupled from its historic US economic leadership. But the global economic boom is not dead – its engines have simply changed. If analysts and investors are prepared to embrace the new world order, 2008 could be a year of great opportunities.
The Asia Pacific region now accounts for almost 37 per cent of world GDP on a purchasing power parity basis, and China alone contributed 17 per cent of global growth in 2007. That is significantly more than the US economy. Emerging Asia contributed 40 per cent to global growth last year, and developing countries 52 per cent.
At the same time, commodity prices continue to rise, driven largely by food and energy
price inflation. Eighteen of 22 emerging markets now face inflation rates exceeding their stated targets. This will continue for three reasons.
First, more countries are reverting to politically motivated price-fixing mechanisms. This will not curb consumer demand or provide incentives for investment in production, exacerbating scarcity.
Second, with infrastructure growth accelerating, developing countries are seeking to
secure resources before their competitors.
Finally, agricultural production requires more and more power as countries seek
to satisfy a 50 per cent increase in the demand for food. Combined with water scarcity and desertification, prices will rise for agricultural goods and energy.
Imbalances in agriculture
Global agricultural production has peaked, while food demand is not going down any time soon. Rising food prices are causing riots anywhere from Cairo to Mexico.
In South Asia, approximately half of the land has been degraded so it no longer has the capacity for food production. China has seen an irreversible loss of nearly a third of its arable land. Over half the world’s population is currently facing a food crisis and a negative water balance, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
We are witnessing just the beginning of a massive pent-up demand for protein from emerging economies. Producing one kilogram of meat requires about 15 times more water than one kilogram of grain. As a consequence, once-mighty rivers now carry a fraction of their former volume and groundwater tables are falling.
Productivity can be raised through genetic engineering, sustainable irrigation, fertilisation and farming technology. The question is whether new technologies can boost the supplies fast enough to meet demands. I am confident that both commodity and equity investors in water, food and agriculture will continue to do very well in relative and absolute terms.
There are currently no comments on this post.
Advertisement
Related Content
Leave a comment
Comment
More
investors' blog
There’s no time like the present
20 August 2008 [0 comments]Keiron Root reminds readers of one of the fundamental rules of successful investing
Land of confusion
19 August 2008 [0 comments]Guy Monson guides investors through the shocks currently affecting the global economy
European sector review
14 August 2008 [0 comments]Henk Potts sees value beginning to appear among the financial stocks
Recommendations
Q&A forum
Disappearing trust 15 August 2008 [0 comments]
I wish to draw your attention to the ‘Resources Investment Trust’, which is listed in What Investment in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Liquidity’. In fact, this trust should be in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources.
The trust was correctly listed in ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources’ up to and including August 2007, issue 293, but in the next issue, September 2007, it had been moved to ‘Specialist: Liquidity’.
Also, the performance figures in issue 302 of What Investment, May 2008, for the Resources Investment Trust appear to be somewhat excessive – far outperforming the Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust. Are you certain that these figures are accurate? The reason I query the figures is because I have seen performance figures for these trusts in
other publications where the Resources Investment Trust mostly underperforms the
Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust.
Derek Crawford
Via email
- The limitations of nominees 8 August 2008
- Further information 1 August 2008
- Downsizing option 25 July 2008
- Taxing questions 18 July 2008
- Open or closed? 11 July 2008
Events
Top 10 Life Funds, 3yr%
| SKANDIA BLACKROCK... | +119.2 | ||
| ZURICH LATIN AMER... | +108.7 | ||
| ZURICH LATIN AMER... | +108.4 | ||
| NU GARTMORE CHINA... | +88.4 | ||
| SKANDIA THREADNEE... | +86.9 | ||
| SKANDIA INVESCO P... | +86.0 | ||
| SKANDIA JPM NEW E... | +83.3 | ||
| AXA GARTMORE CHIN... | +82.8 | ||
| AXA FIRST STATE G... | +79.2 | ||
| ZURICH BGI UK EQU... | +76.9 | ||


Change: