Subscribers iconSite access

home subscribe

Community Q&A forum

Print
Email
Text size
Comment

Junior options

Answered by Anna Bowes
13 September 2007 [0 comments]

Q: 

Please can you give advice on the benefits of a Child Trust Fund compared to an ISA for money over and above that provided by the Government.

M Brody, Via email

 
Email a friend
Your email address:   
Friend's email address:   

A: 

The CTF is effectively an ISA for kids, one that will legally become available to them at 18.  Obviously, kids cannot invest into their own ISA until 16, at which point they can open a cash ISA, so this is a way of investing for them while leaving your own ISA allowance available for saving for your future.

The downside is a lack of flexibility as the money can’t be accessed until they reach age 18 and then the money is theirs so they can do what they like with it, which is fine as long as you have a responsible 18 year old!

It is a particularly tax-efficient savings vehicle for parents, as investments outside the CTF (and the NS&I Children’s Bonus Bond) may be taxable depending on the amount of interest earned. This is known as the “£100 rule” simply because that’s the amount of income that can be earned tax free each year. On any money gifted by a parent into a child’s name, if the income earned on that money is greater than £100 (per parent), the whole amount is taxed as though it belongs to the parent, therefore, at their marginal tax rate!

Investing into an ISA in your name for your child is the best way to retain control of the money. If you choose the ISA route, you need to consider earmarking it in your will, so that if you should die before you give the money to your child, it is clear that it was designated for them.

In summary, there are pros and cons to investing into the CTF – you just need to decide which route offers you and your child the most benefit.

There are currently no comments on this post.

 
Other questions answered by Anna Bowes

Advertisement

Q&A  More Q&A forumspacerQ&AAsk a question

Disappearing trust 

15 August 2008 [0 comments]

Q: 

I wish to draw your attention to the ‘Resources Investment Trust’, which is listed in What Investment in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Liquidity’.  In fact, this trust should be in the sector entitled ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources.
The trust was correctly listed in ‘Specialist: Commodities & Natural Resources’ up to and including August 2007, issue 293, but in the next issue, September 2007, it had been moved to ‘Specialist: Liquidity’.
Also, the performance figures in issue 302 of What Investment, May 2008, for the Resources Investment Trust appear to be somewhat excessive – far outperforming the Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust. Are you certain that these figures are accurate? The reason I query the figures is because I have seen performance figures for these trusts in
other publications where the Resources Investment Trust mostly underperforms the
Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust.
Derek Crawford
Via email

 
 

Recommendations Recommendations

 

Q&A Investors' blog

There’s no time like the present

20 August 2008 [0 comments]

Keiron Root reminds readers of one of the fundamental rules of successful investing 

Land of confusion

19 August 2008 [0 comments]

Guy Monson guides investors through the shocks currently affecting the global economy

European sector review

14 August 2008 [0 comments]

Henk Potts sees value beginning to appear among the financial stocks

 
 

Q&A Events