Equities
FSA snubs proposals to delay regulatory changes
Rob Langston, 18 July 2011
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has ignored calls by the Treasury Select Committee to postpone the implication of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR) by a year.
The financial services regulator said the RDR - which is set to change the way financial advisers are remunerated and require minimum qualifications - would go ahead as planned.
In a statement it reported, 'The FSA notes the report's recommendation on timing but remains committed to implementation from January 2013.
'The RDR is already a long-running initiative with the first consultation paper published in June 2007.'
It added, 'There is clear evidence that the industry is well advanced in its preparations, with 49 per cent of IFAs [independent financial advisers] already qualified and at least 82 per cent expecting to remain as retail investment advisers.'
Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, said although the committee backed reform, the current timetable could lead to large numbers of IFAs leaving the business.
He said, 'In the interests of consumers we are calling on the FSA to delay the RDR by a year to give advisers more time to take the qualifications and comply with the rules.'
Kay Blair, vice chair of the Financial Services Consumer Panel, said advisers had already had several years to reach minimum qualifications.
She said, 'While we acknowledge the cost in terms of time and fees that some advisers will incur in achieving the minimum qualification level, there can be no justification for the FSA to back away from this important requirement at this late stage.
'MPs would be rightly outraged if their constituents were treated by doctors with ‘A' level qualifications or advised by poorly qualified lawyers. There should not be a double standard when it comes to financial advice.'
She added, 'Four years have already passed since the FSA set out the overall objectives for the RDR.
'Further delay will only risk harm to consumers as the effects of poor financial advice - and the burden of opaque fees and costs - can last a lifetime.'
To receive more relevant articles like this one, why not sign up to our weekly newsletters, click here
Advertisement
Free Magazine: How To Invest For Income
Free Magazine: How To Invest For Income In this free edition of MarketViews, Peter Temple highlights key features that can make income-based investing generate such good results. Get your free copy here
Free Guide: 8 Common Trading Indicators
Get this free guide to find out how to use technical indicators to give you a sense of what the market will do next. Get your free copy here.
No hassle and no admin fees. Open an account now with The Share Centre. Find out more.
A free guide to Gold Investment
Physical Gold protects against global economic downturn by providing crucial portfolio balance. You can buy gold bars for your UK pension and receive up to 40% price discount via tax relief. Buy tax-free gold coins as an alternative to poor interest rates. Find out more and download this free guide to gold investment.
The TaxGuide.co.uk has a wealth of tips and advice from working out your tax bill, through to the latest personal tax rules. Get your personal tax tips today.
FREE Report: Inside Investment Trusts
Written by the team behind What Investment, this exclusive FREE report covers:
- Why Investment Trusts are better than Unit Trusts
- How new legislation is broadening the appeal of Investment Trusts
- Where to look for buying opportunities
- Why now is the time to buy Investment Trusts
- The Investment Trusts to invest in at the moment


Comments
Comment by T Hutchison
MP's should worry more about their constituents not IFA's who have been on a gravy train for far too long.There have been far too many instances of corrupt IFA's stealing peoples life savings.Hopefully stronger regulation may help reduce this and enhance confidence in the industry.I fully agree with the FSA on qualification standards for IFA's,this should have been brought in years ago along with removing commission based advice which can only be biased.